promise-making is a way of generating moral obligations – if i promise to pick you up at the airport, then i have taken on a moral obligation to do so. thus, promising to do something the doing of which one cannot control does not result in a new moral obligation. and although the clarity of wedding vows is not universal, many couples carefully construct the wording of their vows, spending a long time talking through what they are and are not willing to promise one another. first, it follows that divorce is morally permissible if marital promises have failed to generate special moral obligations in the first place. you might think that even if the two partners agree to end a marriage, it is still wrong to do so if their promises were made before god.
this principle is relevant to divorce in the following way: if you become unable to do what you have promised to do, then you cannot have a moral obligation to do that thing. in this case, it is morally permissible for the other partner to initiate a divorce on the grounds that his promise to his partner was aimed at making her life better and he is unable to do so given the current situation. but if marital promises are unconditional, then the non-reciprocation of a partner is morally irrelevant, and hence a divorce would be morally impermissible. this does not mean that i no longer have a moral obligation to pick you up from the airport. whether a divorce is morally permissible depends on a great many things, including the content of the promises made between the partners.merely citing a right to be happy does not dissolve the moral obligations we have in other areas of life.
current debates about whether it should be extended beyond its traditional heterosexual constitution, and whether many of its legal incidents should apply to couples who live together without marrying, and about the introduction of civil partnership (modelled closely on marriage) for same-sex couples, make an examination of its contemporary role particularly timely. this article is about the interplay between the institution of marriage and ideas of obligation within personal relationships. second, that this diminution is reflected in the decline in marriage. in doing this it will be seen that the moral bases which underpin people’s personal relationships is complex and does not correspond in a simple way with formal, external social categories. established as the leading british periodical for socio-legal studies, the journal of law and society offers an interdisciplinary approach.
it has a widely respected book review section and is cited globally. wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. founded in 1807, john wiley & sons, inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. with a growing open access offering, wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. this item is part of a jstor collection.
marriage creates moral obligations primarily because it involves promise-making. promise-making is a way of generating moral obligations – if i promise to pick two cases could not be allocated to any category. 1. pragmatic reasons. there were three examples: int. why get married? r. my husband went according to an article about moral character and marriage, it states, “many couples lack a robust moral vocabulary that can help them persevere, ethical issues in relationships, ethical issues in relationships, why is divorce a moral issue, divorce moral issue essay, why is divorce morally wrong.
the problems leading to such an ending are due to lack of understanding between the individuals or arrogance and ego in any one among the couple and lot more. before a crisis occurs, it is vital to have a conversation about morals and ethics within a marriage. in today’s podcast, dr. chris grace this chapter provides the reader with background on common ethical issues—such as client confidentiality, informed consent, record keeping,, ethical issues in marriage counseling, is civil marriage moral, what is your understanding of civil marriage is it moral why brainly, divorce virtue ethics, applying ethical theories to divorce, philosophy of marriage pdf, divorce utilitarianism, kant marriage, metaphysics of marriage, christian ethics on divorce. ten common problems in marriagecommunication issues. the most common complaint among married couples is lack of communication. ignoring boundaries. lack of sexual intimacy. emotional or sexual infidelity. fighting about money. selfishness. value differences. different life stages.
When you try to get related information on moral issues in marriage, you may look for related areas. ethical issues in relationships, why is divorce a moral issue, divorce moral issue essay, why is divorce morally wrong, ethical issues in marriage counseling, is civil marriage moral, what is your understanding of civil marriage is it moral why brainly, divorce virtue ethics, applying ethical theories to divorce, philosophy of marriage pdf, divorce utilitarianism, kant marriage, metaphysics of marriage, christian ethics on divorce.